A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which has due to the fact come to be emblematic of your depth of the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they have been intended to Collect visual proof with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail because of the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute in the lawful timeline.
For the Main in the dispute is usually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain which the wall, as constructed, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become described as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging files, maps, and disorders hooked up to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to planning regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private see, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few merely endeavoring to create a relatives home in accordance with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Place of Conservation and say that all operates happen to be completed according to professional information and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean throughout a storm, tend not to change the underlying specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for the problem that many observers see as more and more prevalent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay alongside one another very long following the legal expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that tackle. For Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.