A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between prospective neighbours over the construction of the wall at a coastal web page in the north Dublin suburb, a case which includes captivated national notice adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier as well as Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction performs at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, request to create their family property. The situation is becoming emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, wherever improvement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting produced by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their arranging permission by developing a wall beyond the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment with a Unique Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result places are issue to strict controls less than European and Irish environmental law. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly within a delicate coastal ecosystem which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful crew has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances, an image that has considering the fact that become emblematic from the depth with the dispute. These actions were not simply symbolic; they have been intended to Get visual evidence of your wall’s position relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how The 2 men entered the h2o for the duration of critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned One of the more putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these kinds of actions were being cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a place affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being lined intimately because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as visitors sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant inside the legal timeline.
With the core in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as produced, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has actually been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems hooked up to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental security and adherence to preparing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their very long-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply just looking to build a family property in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that every one performs are performed depending on Specialist information and accepted options. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into The ocean during a storm, usually do not change the fundamental points.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site happens to be a shorthand description for a problem that numerous observers see as significantly typical. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier observed which the businessman had Beforehand been associated with local advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from really distinctive Skilled backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs Rene Collier went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-superior drinking water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by waist-large h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Actual physical actuality of the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom will have to figure out whether the wall as developed complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment into a Distinctive Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and planning problems. But the human element remains central: neighbours who have to Dwell together with each other lengthy once the lawful prices happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction works at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation extend past that handle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when essential troubles for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as planned will count on the court’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely go on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more closely watched setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.